07/08: The New York State Public Service Commission adopted a three-year rate
plan for Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.’s (O&R) electric delivery
service. Rates for the company’s electric delivery service have not
been increased generally since 1993. The Commission today authorized O&R
to increase rates for electric delivery services in order to generate incremental
annual electric revenues of nearly $15.6 million in each of the three rate
years ending June 30, 2009, 2010, and 2011. This amount results in an increase
in total company electric revenues of approximately 2.5 percent per year.
Source: New York State Public Service Commission
http://www.dps.state.ny.us/
08/04: The New York Public Service Commission (PSC) issued a proceeding related
to “Further Steps Toward Competition in Retail Energy Markets.” In
the proceeding, the PSC suggested methods by which utilities could adopt standards
to encourage retail competition.
Source: New York State Public Service Commission
http://www3.dps.state.ny.us/pscweb/
09/02: A Governor's press release was released and stated that, "Governor
Pataki signed net metering legislation that would encourage farmers to sell
excess electricity generated through the use of anaerobic digesters to utilities.
Net metering laws already exist for electricity generated by solar panels on
homes. The new legislation would expand those laws to include technically qualified
farms as potential "net metering" customers who generate power from
methane."
01/02: Retail competition was fully implemented in Long Island and seven years
ahead of schedule. According to the Public Authorities Control Board buyout,
Long Island Power Authority was required to phase-in retail competition by
2008. The LIPA purchased Long Island Lighting Company's transmission and distribution
system and electric retail operations in May 1998, and reduced electricity
rates by an average of 20 percent. In 1999, 400 MW was open to retail access
and another 400 MW in 2000. The "shopping credit," used for comparing
retail marketers' prices, was increased from 3.5 to 4.5 cents/kWh, giving energy
supply companies more incentive to participate in LIChoice. At the time, retail
marketers were supplying 220.4 MW to 38,039 residential and commercial customers.
06/01: The New York Public Service Commission approved standards governing
the electronic exchange of routine business information and data among electricity
and natural gas service providers in New York. The PSC also issued an order
to establish uniform retail access billing and payment processing practices
that would facilitate a single bill option for customers who buy power and/or
natural gas from ESCOs. The orders were designed to facilitate retail energy
competition in New York and provide for efficient single-billing options for
all New York electricity and natural gas customers.
05/01: The New York Public Service Commission approved Consolidated Edison
Company's rate reduction plan. Beginning April 1, delivery rates were scheduled
to be reduced by $208 million for all Con Edison customers. Phase 4 of Con
Edison's Retail Electricity Choice program was also approved by the PSC, beginning
May 1. Con Edison's competitors could implement small credits as part of their
marketing strategy to attract customers. The credit was based on the amount
Con Edison saved by not having to provide electricity to customers who switch
to alternative suppliers. Also, ConEd would provide a one-time $65 incentive
for each new customer that switched to a competitive supplier. In order to
be eligible at the time, the supplier must have shared the payment with the
customer, and the customer must have been with the supplier for at least three
consecutive billing cycles.
03/01: The PSC approved rules for customers in New York State Electric & Gas
territory to receive a credit for switching to a competitive electricity supplier.
The old "shopping credit" was set, at 3.71 cents per kilowatt-hour,
below market prices. Competitors could not beat that price with market prices
consistently being higher. The new "shopping credit" would be tied
to the going market price plus a small amount for administrative costs, making
it easier for competitors to deal with wholesale prices that fluctuate seasonally.
12/00: The New York Public Service Commission staff released a report recommending
modifications in the operation of the New York Independent System Operator.
The report recommended a hard cap of $150/MWh and the power to order retroactive
refunds. FERC was scheduled to approve the recommendations before they would
become an order.
09/00 U.K. based National Grid Group PLC announced that it would purchase
Niagara Mohawk, New York's second largest electric and gas utility, for $3
billion in stock and cash and the assumption of $5 billion in debt. The deal
would require approval from New York regulators, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and several
other regulatory bodies.
08/00: The PSC approved Niagara Mohawk's plans to reduce delivery prices for
the third year as part of its 5-year price reduction and restructuring plan
of September 1998. The delivery price reduction, which was scheduled to be
implemented on September 1, 2000, would total nearly $19 million. Residential
and small commercial customers were scheduled to see an average delivery price
reduction of about 1.5 percent when compared to September 1, 1999 pricing,
and the largest industrial customers were scheduled to see reductions of about
1.9 percent.
08/00: Dynegy announced the intent to purchase two generating facilities totaling
1,700 MW for $903 million. The facilities included a 500-MW plant owned by
Central Hudson Gas & Electric and a 1,200-MW station jointly owned by Central
Hudson Gas & Electric, Con Edison, and Niagara Mohawk. Both facilities
were located in Newburgh, NY. The transaction was expected to close during
the first quarter of 2001, pending federal and state regulatory approvals.
04/00: The PSC approved a "floating shopping credit" proposed by
ConEd. The shopping credit was proposed to reflect prices published by the
NYISO in the differences between actual and market-based costs would be shared
90/10 between the ratepayers and the stockholders.
12/99: A competitive supplier, NYSEG Solutions, offered Niagara Mohawk Power
Corporation (NIMO) residential customers a choice in generation supplier.
08/99: Niagara Mohawk received approval to reduce prices for the second consecutive
year, beginning September 1, 1999. The price reductions were part of NIMO's
PowerChoice Plan. Average reductions for residential and small commercial consumers
were proposed to be about 1 percent in addition to the approximate 0.8 percent
affected last year. Another reduction scheduled for September 1, 2000, was
scheduled to achieve overall reductions of about 3.2 percent. Industrial customers
would receive larger reductions. Total savings for all customer classes under
the three year Power Choice Plan was proposed to be about $600 million.
08/99: Numerous large business customers in LIPA's Choice Program began receiving
power in August from an alternative supplier, ConEdison Solutions. ConEd Solutions
was supplying about 20 MW of power to over 100 facilities on Long Island at
the time.
04/99: Phase II of ConEd's retail choice program began in April. Nearly 22,000
new customers were enrolled, bringing the total customers in the programs to
more than 68,000 at the time.
02/99: A briefing paper was issued from the New York General Assembly that
criticized the piecemeal PSC process of restructuring. It listed five criteria
that the PSC plan had failed on in restructuring the industry.
02/99: The PSC ordered utilities to submit monthly reports in 1999, and quarterly
reports thereafter, to monitor competition. The reports would contain the number
of consumers eligible to participate, the number of kWh eligible for retail
access, the number of consumers per ESCO in the utility's operating territory,
and the number of kWh provided by each ESCO.
01/99: The governor withdrew a tax break for customers who chose an alternative
generation supplier, resulting in a 4 percent increase in rates for customers
who were "choosing."
12/98: ConEd began Phase II of its customer choice program. Enrollment of
customers to exercise retail choice was scheduled to begin January 1999.
11/98: Orange & Rockland (O&R) and ConEd proposed to sell 16 power
plants (about 1,776 MW of gas, oil, and hydro capacity) in New York to Southern
Company for $480 million.
11/98: NYSEG proposed to sell its fossil fuel-fired generation to AES (6 coal
plants for $950 million) and Edison International (Homer City Station for $1.8
billion).
11/98: The PSC ordered utilities, beginning in 4/00, to inform customers of
the sources of their electricity and their amount of environmentally "clean" power.
11/98: Long Island Power Authority began retail access for 400 MW of load
in January 1999 with a target of August for delivery of power from competitive
providers. The first phase of direct access was split between residential (180
MW), commercial, and government consumers. Phase II was scheduled to open another
800 MW in May 2000. All customers of LIPA were scheduled to have retail choice
by January 2003.
06/98: The PSC set rules for a Systems Benefit Charge to fund R&D related
to energy service, storage, generation, the environment, and renewables; pilot
programs for energy management for low-income consumers; and environmental
protection.
05/98: Due to over-subscription of ConEd's Phase I for retail competition,
the load for residential and small commercial customers was doubled to 1000
MW; a lottery was scheduled to be conducted for large customers. Customers
were also scheduled to begin receiving power from their suppliers of choice
among more than 20 registered ESCO's on June 1.
05/98: Orange and Rockland became the first utility in New York to offer retail
choice through its Power Pick program as customers began to receive power from
their suppliers of choice on May 1, 1998.
02/98: Assembly Bill 7942-D was introduced by Senator Tonko to provide an
alternative deregulation plan to the PSC, saying the current PSC plan did not
go far enough to protect consumers. The bill called for competition in electric
generation no later than March 1, 2000 for all consumers, including municipal
systems and 10 percent rate cuts by September 1998.
02/98: The PSC approved Niagara Mohawk’s plan for rate restructuring,
a nonbypassable CTC to fund $3.6 billion in debt for settlement with 16 independent
power producers to restructure uneconomic contracts, and divestiture of fossil-fueled
and hydroelectric plants. Retail competition was scheduled to begin in 1998
for large customers and be available to all customers by January 1, 2000.
02/98: The PSC approved a restructuring plan for Central Hudson Gas & Electric.
The plan required divestiture of fossil-fueled plants, a rate freeze until
June 30, 2001, rate reductions, and transition to full retail competition by
July 2001.
01/98: The PSC approved New York State Electric & Gas’s restructuring
plan. The plan included a phase-in of retail competition for small industrials
beginning August 1998, full retail competition by August 1999, a rate freeze
and rate cuts, and divestiture of its coal plants by August 1999.
01/98: The PSC approved Rochester Gas & Electric's restructuring plan.
RG&E proposed beginning the restructuring process in July 1998 with open
access for 10 percent of its customers and phase-in full retail access by July
2001. Divestiture of fossil-fueled and hydro plants and rate cuts were also
included in the plan.
12/97: The PSC settled Orange and Rockland's proposal for restructuring. O&R
was scheduled to phase-in retail competition beginning May 1998, allow full
retail competitive by May 1999, provide rate cuts, and require divestiture
of generation assets by May 1999.
09/97: The PSC approved ConEd's restructuring plan. The plan called for rate
cuts, retail competition to phase-in beginning June 1998, and full retail access
by December 2001. In addition, ConEd would file by January 1998 unbundled tariffs
for all classes of customers, to become effective April 1998. The plan also
called for divestiture of at least 50 percent of ConEd's New York City fossil-fueled
generation by the end of 2002.
06/97: The PSC approved a pilot program for more than 17,600 qualified farmers
and food processors, beginning in 11/97.
07/96: The PSC approved O&R's pilot program, "Power Pick," that,
if enacted, would allow industrial consumers retail access to competitive generation
suppliers. The program was scheduled to begin 5/98.
05/96: The PSC issued its opinion and order regarding competitive opportunities
for electric service that restructured New York's electric power industry.
The Competitive Opportunities Case adopted the goal of having a competitive
wholesale market by 1997, and a competitive retail market by early 1998. Electric
utilities were required to submit restructuring plans by October 1996. It also
stated that utilities should have a reasonable opportunity to recover stranded
costs consistent with the goals of restructuring.